Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/secmodel/bsd44
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 11/01/2006 13:08:39
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> kauth_authorize_device(cred, KAUTH_DEVICE_RAWIO, r/w/passthru, vp, some_data);
>>> i wonder what's the status of devvp branch.
>> we can only do the above if we can gurantee the vp at all times... for
>> now I think we should pass dev:
>> kauth_authorize_device(cred, KAUTH_DEVICE_RAWIO, r/w/passthru, dev,
>> (and we note in the man-page listeners for that request should use
> seems fine to me.
okay, I'll do that.
>> and, that allows us to make kauth_authorize_device_tty() a wrapper
>> around that one, and not directly call kauth_authorize_action() if we
> i'm not sure if it is counted as a benefit.
call overhead? :)