Subject: Re: Relaxing NFS wcc checks
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/01/2006 09:16:03
On 11/1/06, YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > > This causes problems when a file is
> > > > accessed/created/whatever and the cached data is inserted on the exact
> > > > same nanosecond in the wcc.
> > >
> > > what problem are you talking about?
> > > the message itself isn't a problem. it means the client is trying
> > > to avoid problems.
> > But why is it considered a problem if the times are _equal_?
> please read a url uwe provided.
I did, but didn't understand it at first (most likely because it said
that file systems should be converted to use microtime and tmpfs is
already using it). Now I think I do.
Could it be very difficult to improve the comment in the function to
include the mail's first paragraph?
Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The Julipedia - http://julipedia.blogspot.com/