Subject: Re: MNT_NOSHARE for non-exportable fs [was: Removing tmpfs'
To: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/30/2006 15:15:32
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:57:52 +0200, Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org> wrote:
> 
>> off-list

heh, thought I got rid of that bad habit :)

>>
>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> can you consider to revert the change?
>> was there really a consensus against it?
>>
>> the last mail on this thread is mine:
>>
>> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2006/10/25/0028.html
>>
>> and there's an open question in it (to smb@)...
>>
> Sorry, I thought I'd answered.
> 
> No, I don't have an answer I'm happy with; I regard it as a research
> question. 

we can address that using fileassoc(9), or at least that'd be a start..

> I stand by the main point in the note of mine you were
> responding to: "no export" as a security flag is a bad idea. 

are we using it as a security flag?

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat