Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/secmodel/bsd44
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 10/30/2006 02:01:06
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>>>> and, if possible, the acutal user request (eg. mly_user_command).
>>>> I assume mly_user_command is a kauth(9) enum? (like KAUTH_REQ_DEVICE_..)
>>>> if yes, do we care about 3rd-party device drivers that can use such
>>>> requests? in such cases we don't have the actual user request.
>>> i meant to pass a driver-specific structure via void *.
>>> bsd44 listeners will just ignore it.
>>> a listener can investigate the arg only when it knows the driver.
>> okay. we have kauth_authorize_device_tty(). do you want to add a
>> kauth_authorize_device() or a different routine? if so, any preference
>> for a prototype?
> i personally prefer everything typed as far as possible.
> int kauth_authorize_device_passthrough(kauth_cred_t cred, dev_t controller,
> const void *user_request);
hrm. that seems overkill to me...
> btw, isn't it better to move RAWIO to the device scope?
for both memory and disk?