> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> 
> > i'd vote to have a separate "passthru" kauth request.
> > it's different enough from normal raw device i/o, IMO.
> 
> I'm somewhat concerned we are providing two requests that can end up
> implying more or less the same. If we do that, it'll have to be
> documented properly.
> 
> How will the policy look like? do we always assume worst-case and
> act as if "passthru" is raw i/o to mounted disk or memory?

i'm not sure what you are talking about.
are you talking about how bsd44 listener should interact with these requests? 

YAMAMOTO Takashi