> > i object.  please revert.
> 
> I'm gonna have to let other people voice in before I revert this one.

ok.

> > well, i don't care if it's almost no-op when not enabled,
> > but currently it doesn't seem the case.
> 
> What do you mean "it doesn't seem the case"?

i meant, it's far from no-op.

> >> No objections on tech-kern.
> > 
> > i think i've missed it.  sorry.
> > can you provide a pointer to the proposal?
> 
> Sure:
> 
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2006/10/22/0015.html

thanks.
i was happier if you posted it with a more appropriate subject. :-)

YAMAMOTO Takashi