Subject: Re: Veriexec enabled by default
To: Elad Efrat <>
From: Jason Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/26/2006 09:10:44
On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Elad Efrat wrote:

> Jason Thorpe wrote:
>> What is the performance impact of "in there, but not enabled"?
> Good question. :) What would be a good test?

A fork-exec benchmark?  You've added heat to the exec code path, so  
that's what you need to measure.

-- thorpej