Subject: Re: Veriexec enabled by default
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/26/2006 08:59:57
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Re-sending a message with the relevant bits:
> On a different note, somewhat off-topic, I'm going to enable by
> both fileassoc(9) and veriexec(9) in GENERIC. Reasons being that
> Veriexec is actually *used* it doesn't hurt to have it there, and
> it enabled by default makes them more accessible.
What is the performance impact of "in there, but not enabled"?