Subject: Re: Veriexec enabled by default
To: Elad Efrat <>
From: Jason Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/26/2006 08:59:57
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Elad Efrat wrote:

> Hi,
> Re-sending a message with the relevant bits:
> On a different note, somewhat off-topic, I'm going to enable by  
> default
> both fileassoc(9) and veriexec(9) in GENERIC. Reasons being that  
> unless
> Veriexec is actually *used* it doesn't hurt to have it there, and  
> having
> it enabled by default makes them more accessible.

What is the performance impact of "in there, but not enabled"?

-- thorpej