Subject: Re: /proc + Linux emul: "exe" is no symlink
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 10/25/2006 07:11:01
On Oct 25, 9:11am, firstname.lastname@example.org (Hubert Feyrer) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: /proc + Linux emul: "exe" is no symlink
| On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > What we do is actually better because if the executable is removed ours
| > will still work. But we could have two entries I guess for this; one
| > a symlink and the other the real inode.
| I think you missed the point - what we do is not what Linux does, which
| breaks compatibility. We can do TRT if "-o linux" is not used.
I said: we can have two entries for it; one a symlink "exe" for linux
compatibility and the other eg. "prog" contain the real inode.