Subject: Re: Removig generic optstr_get
To: Quentin Garnier <>
From: Bill Studenmund <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/24/2006 15:53:13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:44:52AM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 10:20:49PM +0200, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:46:18PM +0200, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >=20
> > > Objections?
> >=20
> > Is there a real need for this change? I would prefer leaving things as
> > they are now.
> >=20
> > (We might want to support richer boot parameters with other boot methods
> > than Multiboot one day.)
> And proplib will still be there for that.

I think the question is more about what will be passing us the info to=20
parse. If we can ensure it will be in a proplib format, you're right; we=20
don't need this other code. If however it might be in a "a=3Db c=3Dd" forma=
this code is useful.

Take care,


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)