Subject: Re: Smoother writing for LFS
To: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/23/2006 19:45:17
--6THr7QwYWIbrk6Kt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:22:45PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:17:19PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> >=20
> > I'm curious what is so different between our syncfs and FreeBSD's. Or=
=20
> > between ours and where Free's was back when we got softdeps. They don't=
=20
> > have these problems AFAIK.
>=20
> Unless they've rewritten it completely, they do.  Kirk's syncfs code
> is, sadly, broken by design.

Ok then. :-(

Take care,

Bill

--6THr7QwYWIbrk6Kt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFFPX49Wz+3JHUci9cRAnjaAJ9kIc3lLTMuJzy8VHuKXeNJsh7YIgCfcXkQ
lp/IuBEXNRfZfaYiIbkMUrU=
=Bfol
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6THr7QwYWIbrk6Kt--