Subject: Re: mp->mnt_vnodelist change
To: Simon Burge <simonb@NetBSD.org>
From: Reinoud Zandijk <email@example.com>
Date: 10/20/2006 13:28:04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:38:28AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> In retrospect with the following suggestions, it would have been easier
> to say "try to use TAILQ_FOREACH every time you see a for loop, rather
> than list them all out...
sure! but i didn't to break too much in one go :-) so i decided first to go
for the safe option :)
A few routines have a check to see if the `next' has been changed and
reloop, what to do with those i dont know yet.
> and here? I looks like the "vp = nvp;" for each case is the same
> as just saying "vp = vp->v_mntvnodes ....".
> As they stand, wouldn't those changes above need to change the
> nvp = vp->v_mntvnodes.le_next;
> line to
> nvp = TAILQ_NEXT(vp->v_mntvnodes)
those should all be fixed :) or it wouldn't compile ;) i'll double check
Thanks for the feedback,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v18.104.22.168 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----