Subject: Re: improving kqueue
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matthew Mondor <email@example.com>
Date: 10/15/2006 00:44:08
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:19:51 -0700
Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > No, let's do something like what I mention. The difference is that all
> > > vnodes that are being watched have notes indicating that they are being
> > > watched. If a vnode has no "being watched" indication, it's not being
> > > watched. :-)
> > [...]
> > > Let's copy what SVR4 did, with some modernizations.
> > Would this book be "The Design of the UNIX Operating System" from Bach?
> I believe that book is what I have in mind. :-)
BTW, I admit I didn't yet take a look at fileassoc(9) internals (not
running -current), but would it currently be ideal to store the
per-vnode data we were talking about?
Note: Please only reply on the list, other mail is blocked by default.
Private messages from your address can be allowed by first asking.