YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> is it for (a few instances of) bounds_check_with_label?
>> Originally it's for drivers that allow raw access to disk (and memory)
>> but don't have vnode/device references; if it fits for more stuff then
>> yeah. For now it's just a place-holder (hence, no documentation update).
> 
> a place-holder?
> do you mean you'll remove this "no vnode/device" case later?

Exactly the opposite: I mean that right now no code uses it, but later
this will change and code will use it.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat