Subject: re: p_flag in struct proc: int -> uint64_t
To: Juergen Hannken-Illjes <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/09/2006 18:57:06
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:33:01PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2006, at 6:53 PM, matthew green wrote:
> >i agree. we should move away from link sets even tho they are really
> >quite handy...
> I am ok with keeping them around for kernel-private stuff, i.e. things
> that will never be able to load as an LKM. But eventually, I'd like
> the "load as LKM" and "statically compiled into the kernel" code paths
> to be identical, including the invocation of init and fini routines.
Agreed. This is what I need them for. The file system transactions are
helper functions and will probably never be loadable as an LKM.
hmm? almost all our file systems work as LKM's currently...