On Oct 8, 2006, at 6:53 PM, matthew green wrote:

> i agree.  we should move away from link sets even tho they are really
> quite handy...

I am ok with keeping them around for kernel-private stuff, i.e. things  
that will never be able to load as an LKM.  But eventually, I'd like  
the "load as LKM" and "statically compiled into the kernel" code paths  
to be identical, including the invocation of init and fini routines.

-- thorpej