tech-kern: subr_vmem.c supersedes subr

Subject: subr_vmem.c supersedes subr_blist.c?
To: NetBSD Kernel Technical Discussion List <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/05/2006 16:29:56

Doesn't vmem(9) supersede the functionality in subr_blist.c?  If so,  
the stuff that uses blists should be changed to use vmem, and  
subr_blist.c deleted from the tree.

-- thorpej