Subject: Re: p_flag in struct proc: int -> uint64_t
To: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 10/05/2006 10:40:16
Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Ok, here is a generalized (and currently untested) "specificdata"
> implementation, based on Yamamoto-san's. proc, lwp, and session
> specific-data could be built on top of this, a'la (note this is
This looks very useful (and a lot like fileassoc(9), actually :).
IIUC, can we use this to extend various objects in the kernel, with
a single change to their structure? I have some thoughts about using
it for extending a kauth_cred_t...