Subject: Re: p_flag in struct proc: int -> uint64_t
To: Jason Thorpe <>
From: Jonathan A. Kollasch <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/02/2006 21:09:37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:48:32PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Another option would be to provide some generic way for various =20
> subsystems to extend the data associated with a process on an as-=20
> needed basis... oh, hey, we could add a properties dictionary to the =20
> proc structure to get that! :-)

I can't believe I'm saying this (I'm not really into the plist
mania), but I'd love to see that kind of thing.  It seems
preferable to the GID kludge traditionally used to create
PAGs for an AFS client.

	Jonathan Kollasch

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)