Subject: Re: Journaling for FFS
To: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 10/02/2006 13:13:13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:10:26PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:56:25PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:16:29PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > Depends on how you do it. If you go for a physical block journal, it's =
> > same for FFS1 and FFS2. A logical journal (which I dislike, but wouldn'=
> > block if it showed up as a complete thing) will be different. Well,=20
> > journal replay will care.
> Yes, but even in this case it shouldn't be a big issue.
> Probably less than adding quota support to FFF2 :)
Though if we do add quota support, there are some details we should look=20
at that came up in previous ffs discussions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----