--5L6AZ1aJH5mDrqCQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:10:26PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:56:25PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:16:29PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >=20
> > Depends on how you do it. If you go for a physical block journal, it's =
the=20
> > same for FFS1 and FFS2. A logical journal (which I dislike, but wouldn'=
t=20
> > block if it showed up as a complete thing) will be different. Well,=20
> > journal replay will care.
>=20
> Yes, but even in this case it shouldn't be a big issue.
> Probably less than adding quota support to FFF2 :)

True. :-)

Though if we do add quota support, there are some details we should look=20
at that came up in previous ffs discussions.

Take care,

Bill

--5L6AZ1aJH5mDrqCQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFFIXLZWz+3JHUci9cRAjaXAJ4tzmiRNrjGsAM7RJOdUyxkRe62BgCghWzm
UWnC3Qq35qzqxCIxN0ImBOQ=
=0ouO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5L6AZ1aJH5mDrqCQ--