Subject: Re: veriexec (Re: CVS commit: src)
To: None <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
Date: 09/30/2006 21:04:16
> > has this (adding more #ifdef for veriexec) been discussed and/or
> > reviewed publicly?
> No. However, if someone has any concrete objection, I'd love to hear the
sprinkle more and more #ifdef is a maintainance headache
esp. for people who are not interested in veriexec. (like me.)
> > btw, what's the point to distinguish "indirect" from "direct"?
> For this case or in general?
in the design of veriexec.