Subject: Re: Further scheduler changes
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jed Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/20/2006 19:55:40
Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com> writes:
> I should note that we have already been offered a patch to do this, by
> Christian Limpach. It was rejected -- to my utter disbelief -- by an
> influential developer because, since it packed "which run queue am I
> on" into an integer with one bit per CPU, it would require later revision
> to accomodate systems with more than 32 processors.
Uh... don't we already have some 32-bit per-CPU bitsets in various places?
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l)))))) (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k))))))) '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))