Subject: Re: state of BUFQ_PRIOCSCAN
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/20/2006 22:00:48
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:17:43PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > Maybe the author (yamt) can explain us why is it marked experimental?
> > i can't remember why. :)
> I thought I remembered that you said it didn't work right because the
> VM system didn't distinguish between pages that were dirty for different
> reasons. I do not remember the details!
Mentioned in this post?
Or UVM has been improved enough in these days?