matthew green wrote:
>    
>    Instead cpu_idle() should I think we should add a member to cpu_info
>    which indicates cpu_idle should continue to loop.  When nonzero, it
>    represents that there may be a new lwp to be run.
> 
> 
> why can't this just use sched_whichqs instead of a new member?

Because we are trying to make the MD routines be independent of the
scheduler.
-- 
Matt Thomas                     email: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry              www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA              disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.