Subject: Re: newlock
To: Bill Studenmund <>
From: Jason Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/05/2006 16:17:48
On Sep 5, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Bill Studenmund wrote:

> Another would be an iSCSI initiator where splbio() and splnet() get
> mingled. And heven help someone trying to do iSCSI over ppp. :-)

Sorry, this is really splbio() and splsoftnet().

What this really points to is "we do too much stuff in interrupt  
context", and really ought to be deferring more to threads /  
continuations / just-in-time processing.

-- thorpej