Subject: Re: Upcoming security model abstraction
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 09/03/2006 17:15:26
Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> secmodel/sm_bsd44_foo.c ?
> Or put the security models into src/sys/kern/secmodel_bsd44_* ?
Personally, I think '<model>_<function>.c' is elaborate enough.
Consider 'bsd44_suser.c' or 'bsd44_securelevel.c' - should make it
clear what these are; if this is still too 'vague' (and seriously,
take a moment to think where this is really effective), I'll go for