Subject: Re: Upcoming security model abstraction
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/03/2006 16:12:47
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Elad Efrat wrote:
>> I suggest secmodel/secmodel_bsd44.c as is common practice (like e.g.
> That means we'll have to use files with names like
> secmodel_<model>_foo.c which is starting to get ugly.
Or put the security models into src/sys/kern/secmodel_bsd44_* ?
Just some ideas...