Subject: Re: Upcoming security model abstraction
To: Elad Efrat <>
From: Hubert Feyrer <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/03/2006 16:12:47
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Elad Efrat wrote:
>> I suggest secmodel/secmodel_bsd44.c as is common practice (like e.g.
>> kern/kern_*).
> That means we'll have to use files with names like
> secmodel_<model>_foo.c which is starting to get ugly.

secmodel/sm_bsd44_foo.c ?
Or put the security models into src/sys/kern/secmodel_bsd44_* ?

Just some ideas...

  - Hubert