Subject: Re: Upcoming security model abstraction
To: None <tgen@netphreax.net>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/03/2006 17:07:18
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:

> I suggest secmodel/secmodel_bsd44.c as is common practice (like e.g.
> kern/kern_*).

That means we'll have to use files with names like
secmodel_<model>_foo.c which is starting to get ugly.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat