Subject: Re: Upcoming security model abstraction To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org> From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org> List: tech-kern Date: 09/03/2006 17:07:18
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> I suggest secmodel/secmodel_bsd44.c as is common practice (like e.g.
That means we'll have to use files with names like
secmodel_<model>_foo.c which is starting to get ugly.