--RANKzUNLbtIjfOSf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:40:39AM +0200, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:07:28AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > I might also change the defines to be KERNEL_OPT_FOO at the same time.
>=20
> that is, for options FOO, config would #define KERNEL_OPT_FOO?
>=20
> I think that this is not a good idea. Currently you can define an
> arbitrary kernel macro by just adding the "options" line to the config
> file. The proposed change would destroy that feature.

How come?  My reading of David's proposal is that opt_*.h would contain
KERNEL_OPT_FOO definitions.  It doesn't mean the way unrestrictive
options are handled has to be changed.

In any case, I'd rather see that feature disappear, promoting the use of
"makeoptions CPPFLAGS+=3D" instead.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--RANKzUNLbtIjfOSf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBRPRFEdgoQloHrPnoAQIiVAf+NFzxhYqIfQ4ju3x43JPdIcrU7PcsjPcq
ifoEQp037AyujaKGY55WzX3exw16HvStN9ODJTXuPjvly8ICXGqjE9zPaDv8+uMR
kJ9tPtPT74GuyMSU5QVgnonCUCu+8NJB4A0eSg+7vtfpZf2sz3s8OPw0rqB+tnrD
te76uzjU9Njo0zf3o9jFVppMaoTijdZbnA5qKjksRxfvQkkq26Y2HJ+gteFuauwo
8APImWy+FCv5cGngkDc+9e/m7zY9ogz6OntWlfm8A60Y0hmIRT+pE21TgvgYo9JP
Jh5ufA+ZdhssSB0skCokD2GUTb0xNulqkRAhf+/UJxMH6uYmLvbNYg==
=Mrdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RANKzUNLbtIjfOSf--