Subject: Re: IPL_LOCK oddity
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/24/2006 09:38:11
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:18:12PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > In chatting with dbj, I was reminded that on a number of ports, we have
> > IPL_SERIAL higher than IPL_LOCK. IPL_IPI also is higher than IPL_LOCK on
> > x86 (I didn't check extensively).
> > Also, is the IPI code structured so that it doesn't have to take locks?
> x86 ipi code uses raw __cpu_simple_lock for that reason.
And maybe the serial code should use that too ... The locks here are not
supposed to be hold for long times, from what I remember.
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference