Subject: Re: SE Linux vs SE NetBSD !!
To: Alan Silva <email@example.com>
From: ober <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/23/2006 18:50:26
ALL THE ZFS ARE BELONG TO YOU??
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Alan Silva wrote:
> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:30:48 -0300
> From: Alan Silva <email@example.com>
> To: tech-kern@NetBSD.org, tech-security@NetBSD.org
> Subject: Re: SE Linux vs SE NetBSD !!
> Why dont have SE extensions ported to NetBSD??? Any idea of porting
> for NetBSD??? IMHO its a great idea!!!
> [ ]'s
> On 8/22/06, Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:01:00AM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:35:40PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>> > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, kamel derouiche wrote:
>> > > >we can to find the equivalent betwen SE Linux in
>> > > >NetBSD?
>> > >
>> > > What do you mean? (And why is this on tech-kern?)
>> > Single-Ended Linux (as opposed to Differential)? No, that's SCSI.
>> > Seriously, he might think of something like "security enhanced" or
>> > "small embedded" ... but I don't know which of them.
>> security enhanced: