Subject: Re: SE Linux vs SE NetBSD !!
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com>
From: Alan Silva <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/23/2006 19:30:48
Why dont have SE extensions ported to NetBSD??? Any idea of porting
for NetBSD??? IMHO its a great idea!!!
On 8/22/06, Pavel Cahyna <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:01:00AM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:35:40PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, kamel derouiche wrote:
> > > >we can to find the equivalent betwen SE Linux in
> > > >NetBSD?
> > >
> > > What do you mean? (And why is this on tech-kern?)
> > Single-Ended Linux (as opposed to Differential)? No, that's SCSI.
> > Seriously, he might think of something like "security enhanced" or
> > "small embedded" ... but I don't know which of them.
> security enhanced: