Subject: Re: [RFC] doshutdownhooks() and friends.
To: Matt Thomas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Allen Briggs <email@example.com>
Date: 07/27/2006 22:04:06
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:11:40AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
> shutdownhooks should go away. instead we should have a two stage
> process and, for devices, this should be using ca_activate in
> struct cfattach. For filesystems, we should add a vfs_activate
> to struct vfsops.
> (*wdc_ca.ca_activate)(wdc_cd.cd_devs, DVACT_DEACTIVATE_PREPARE);
> Ask the device to prepare to quiesce, it returns 0 if it is ready or
> an errno if it's not possible. If it returns EAGAIN, call with PREPARE
> again after deactivating next device. If at the end of the device list
> and there are devices returning EAGAIN, either panic or fail the
> Now depending on results of the PREPARE, either call the ca_activate with
> DVACT_DEACTIVATE_COMMIT (now really quiesce) or DVACT_DEACTIVATE_CANCEL
> (resume normal operation). COMMIT and CANCEL not allowed to fail.
I like this proposal in principle, but it needs a some more fleshing
out. Are either of you able and/or willing to flesh out the proposal
and/or do the work to make it happen?
Use NetBSD! http://www.NetBSD.org/