Subject: Re: kauth sleepability (Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man9)
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
From: Elad Efrat <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/21/2006 01:38:32
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> isn't it better to do the opposite?
> ie. callers of kauth_authorize_action should not assume it never sleep.

given the replacement of suser() with kauth_authorize_action() (or, the
authorization wrappers) we might have some places where the code
actually expects it don't sleep, no?


Elad Efrat