Subject: Re: pcilkm (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/lkm/dev/pcilkm)
To: Quentin Garnier <email@example.com>
From: TAMURA Kent <kent@NetBSD.org>
Date: 07/18/2006 12:25:52
> > Does it mean pcilkm doesn't work with small changes on
> > NetBSD-current and we need another approach?
> It might, but what's the point when a better way of writing PCI devices
> LKMs already exists? Matthias's way is much better. pcilkm was not a
> lot more than a hack.
What is `Matthias's way'?
TAMURA Kent <kent_2006 at hauN.org> <kent at NetBSD.org>