--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:23:23AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>=20
> On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Bill Studenmund wrote:
>=20
> >Agreed. Right now, I think the only question is what we are =20
> >promising and
> >what standards require.
>=20
> As I said in a previous message, the standards appear to be silent on =20
> this issue.  I also discussed this with a co-worker on the way into =20
> work this morning.  This particular individual used to work at Sun as =20
> a performance guy.  He indicated to me that Solaris works basically =20
> the way that Andy is proposing.  Let's just take a lesson from that =20
> -- they pass the standards muster, so I don't think we need to worry =20
> about it.

Ok.

Take care,

Bill

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEs9zpWz+3JHUci9cRAmE1AJ9xFiegqLeMw9QhLhZIhIPJLutAewCfU3kp
+JMFMU7jc4uvg7e9c4zTfOw=
=4Rcj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--