Subject: Re: power management and related concerns
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Garrett D'Amore <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/05/2006 15:10:35
Thanks. I am likely to be hacking some of this into sysmon shortly... :-)
Quick question: how important is it to retain backwards compatibility
for powerd and sysmon. (E.g. using an old powerd with a new sysmon/kernel?)
Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Commit, commit! :-) Seriously, you had some common ioctl as I recall,
>> and I can easily see making sysmon use these.
> Ok, the changes are in -- You need to define the ioctl (because each
> driver might have several property list accessors / mutators). If you
> have any questions on how to use the new stuff, let me know.
>> Frankly, I'd also like to use property lists as events generated in
>> individual drivers, so that the actual sysmon driver can do only minimal
>> interpretation and just pass up any event it doesn't care about. ;-)
> Sounds reasonable, through it would be nice to have some generic
> functions for creating common event types, like currently exist.
> -- thorpej
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
Phone: 951 325-2134 Fax: 951 325-2191