Subject: Re: control tool for amr(4)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
Date: 06/30/2006 08:23:16
> > > > I made a few more changes.. An uncompiled & untested diff is attached:
> > > >
> > > > - pass l->l_proc to bus_dmamap_load() so we don't need to double
> > > > buffer
> > >
> > > Only do this if you vslock the buffer!
> > and vslock is fragile...
> Hum. So we should probably stick with the double-buffer then ?
if it isn't performance critical, maybe.
for details, see PR/25639 and PR/32700.