Subject: Re: control tool for amr(4)
To: None <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/30/2006 08:23:16
> > > > I made a few more changes.. An uncompiled & untested diff is attached:
> > > >
> > > > - pass l->l_proc to bus_dmamap_load() so we don't need to double
> > > > buffer
> > >
> > > Only do this if you vslock the buffer!
> >
> > and vslock is fragile...
>
> Hum. So we should probably stick with the double-buffer then ?
if it isn't performance critical, maybe.
for details, see PR/25639 and PR/32700.
YAMAMOTO Takashi