Subject: Re: timecounters and rnd(4)
To: <>
From: Chapman Flack <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/23/2006 11:48:45
Rhialto wrote:
> Those names sound reversed to me, since the non-get versions do
> a more thorough 'getting' of the time.

microtime v. cachedmicrotime ?

microtime v. quickmicrotime  ?

microtime v. estmicrotime    ?

Or are the current names consistent with the FreeBSD prior art, and
worth preserving for the sake of consistency?