Bill Studenmund wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:21:30PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>   
>> Charles M. Hannum wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:54:53PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>   
>>> As for zs vs. com, notice that their guts are almost identical.  Maybe
>>> this is because I retooled both of them at the same time...
>>>       
>> Maybe.  I should look at it in more detail.  It looks like there are
>> enough differences that making zs.c just another instantiation of com(4)
>> might be a bad idea.  (The separate mouse/keyboard streams at least
>> comes to mind.)
>>     
>
> That'd be a bad idea. The 8530 has enough stuff going on that trying to 
> shove it into a different family's concept of how registers work & such 
> would just be nasty.
>
> Charles got the core of the logic right in the two of them, that's good 
> enough.
>
> Take care,
>
> Bill
>   

That matches my analysis.   Thanks.

    -- Garrett

-- 
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Phone: 951 325-2134  Fax: 951 325-2191