--wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:21:30PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Charles M. Hannum wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:54:53PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >  =20
> > As for zs vs. com, notice that their guts are almost identical.  Maybe
> > this is because I retooled both of them at the same time...
>=20
> Maybe.  I should look at it in more detail.  It looks like there are
> enough differences that making zs.c just another instantiation of com(4)
> might be a bad idea.  (The separate mouse/keyboard streams at least
> comes to mind.)

That'd be a bad idea. The 8530 has enough stuff going on that trying to=20
shove it into a different family's concept of how registers work & such=20
would just be nasty.

Charles got the core of the logic right in the two of them, that's good=20
enough.

Take care,

Bill

--wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEl09dWz+3JHUci9cRAiNrAJ9EM9OHLr+LSBQPFl17WYY8gs+KXgCfb1bZ
olew0w7VAUp8iT7l8gN+vpE=
=e3W5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wLAMOaPNJ0fu1fTG--