garrett_damore@tadpole.com wrote:

> Well, I don't want to have this sit in a branch forever.  I actually
> tried to be compliant and make the changes you suggested, but got bit in
> the ass.

Well, I'd say it's better to wait a bit anyway...

> At this point, I'm going to stand my ground, I think.  Of course, core@
> can always make the final decision. :-)

Of cource I won't object core's dicision.

> The problem is I had this conversation on tech-kern months ago.  It
> bike-shedded.

IIRC, the discussion was about com_arbus.c, i.e. stride or regmap.
Was there any discussion about actual regmap implementation
before you posted it here about two days ago?
---
Izumi Tsutsui