Subject: Re: com rumblings...
To: None <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/17/2006 01:18:08
thorpej@shagadelic.org wrote:

> > Why don't you make them wrapper functions which prepare struct softc?
> > How about structures like this?
> 
> I think it would be a good idea to get away from creating fake softcs.

Hmm, my intention to create fake softcs is to make
CSR_{READ,WRITE} macros take softc as most drivers do.
If it's okay to make them take struct com_regs, faked one
isn't needed. (I don't have strong insistence which is better)
---
Izumi Tsutsui