On Jun 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:

> FWIW, if I were dealing with a sane driver where nearly all  
> routines had
> the softc passed in, I would have made CSR_READ/WRITE take that softc.
> But since there were a number of functions that operate without a  
> softc
> (basically the console stuff), I decided it was better to create a
> structure that had only the data in it needed for the console.

I agree completely.

-- thorpej