Subject: Re: metahook(9)
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/15/2006 09:22:08
On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:51 AM, Elad Efrat wrote:

>> yes.  and function names etc.
>
> Okay, so metahook_inode_foo() becomes metahook_file_foo() and "ino_t
> inode" becomes "ino_t file"?

Or "fileid".  "inode" implies a specific implementation, whereas  
"fileid" is a more generic concept.

-- thorpej