Subject: Re: com rumblings...
To: Gavan Fantom <email@example.com>
From: Garrett D'Amore <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/15/2006 08:42:46
Gavan Fantom wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> I'm more interested in this for console type activity. I suspect
>> *most* people only use serial ports for console ports and slower
>> peripheral accesses (signature readers, cash drawers, command channel
>> for other ICs, etc.)
> While that may be true in many cases, I think you'll still find a lot of
> people either regularly or occasionally using modems.
> I recently moved house, and before I got DSL in my new house, I was
> heavily reliant on a serial port to connect to a modem.
> Also, don't forget that many newer boxes run their consoles at 115200.
> It's also not uncommon to need to transfer data on the console port to
> embedded devices, such as firmware upgrades via XModem, or even kernels.
> And, I've certainly needed to cut&paste uuencoded files into the console
> on occasion.
Fair enough. I've been running this stuff at 115200 myself, but thats
for a local console. I don't have a truly slow machine to test it with,
and all my serial ports have FIFOs. :-)
> It wouldn't surprise me if there were people out there using slower
> machines for routers etc, and suddenly finding the need to implement a
> modem could easily result in the modem being attached to the router.
True. Well, I hope folks will test what I have as soon as I put it up,
so that we can get a sense whether the serial driver performance is hurt
by what I've done, or hurt enough that it impacts the ability to use it
on some machines.
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
Phone: 951 325-2134 Fax: 951 325-2191