Subject: Re: metahook(9)
To: None <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
Date: 06/15/2006 17:16:26
> > if it doesn't handle normal filesystem activities, what's the point of
> > making it filesystem-specific?
> How is it filesystem-specific? for the sake of the discussion, can you
> please mention that filesystems that will NOT be supported with the
> current scheme?
i meant "filesystem-specific" == "can't be used anything other than
filesystems". sorry if it was confusing.
> > "file"?
> And how do you intend on implementing that?
i'm talking about the term here.