> > if it doesn't handle normal filesystem activities, what's the point of
> > making it filesystem-specific?
> 
> How is it filesystem-specific? for the sake of the discussion, can you
> please mention that filesystems that will NOT be supported with the
> current scheme?

i meant "filesystem-specific" == "can't be used anything other than
filesystems".  sorry if it was confusing.

> > "file"?
> 
> And how do you intend on implementing that?

i'm talking about the term here.

YAMAMOTO Takashi