YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> if it doesn't handle normal filesystem activities, what's the point of
> making it filesystem-specific?

How is it filesystem-specific? for the sake of the discussion, can you
please mention that filesystems that will NOT be supported with the
current scheme?

Also, if this is such a serious problem, why has Veriexec been doing
it for 4 years?

> "file"?

And how do you intend on implementing that?

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat