Subject: preferred naming for static symbols in kernel
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Chapman Flack <email@example.com>
Date: 06/06/2006 14:10:12
Though it doesn't seem specifically documented in [style] or
//w.n.o/Documentation/kernel, it is clear enough that the
convention for global symbols in module 'foo' is always
and so on. What's less clear is the preferred convention
for foo's private functions and structures:
The last seems like it could be annoying in ddb, which sees even
private symbols. But otherwise it makes sense when the symbols
are, after all, private.
I might prefer the second to the first just because it gives a
visual clue that it's not something exposed. But is there an
official guideline for this?