Subject: Re: wpi port -- Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG chipset.
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Rui Paulo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/06/2006 01:29:58
At Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:49:32 +1000,
matthew green wrote:
> Another idea would be to include the ucode in base. It seems that ath
> microcode has a similar license and we have it in base .
> the license seems 3-clause UCB-alike to me. what do others think?
> i think we could just put it in base.
> Maybe this issue should be directed to board@ or core@.
> : I've been told that by including it in CVS would be considered a
> modification. If this is true, we could make the binary file a C
> array, include that file in the CVS tree and then build the original
> binary file that way. IANAL.
> how does putting it CVS modify it? i don't buy this at all.
Well, if we just make sure we use -kb I guess there's no problem.